First, the meaning of the word apocryphal
The word "apocryphi" means "hidden" and "epicurean" means "hidden travel" and there are two types of epoch
Abocrivia legal and is historically called a second legal as a historical collection arrangement and not less important than the first law only in the time of collection and therefore the second legal toxicity
Abukrivia is illegal and is not inspired by some of the books and others
First Legal Travels
After the return of the captivity collected by Ezra 534 BC
Second Legal Travels
Some did not appear during Ezra, such as Herodit and Tobiah, some of which were written after Ezra, so he was dubbed the second legal history
A question arises here why did not all the books appear during Ezra?
To answer this, we must know that the ancient script was written on the parchment, which is the papers made from the skins of animals and written in bold script, and this one book was weighing a lot. It was difficult for many to carry the books while carrying their young, but the mighty men of God who ventured their lives in order to preserve these books carried some of them and some hid in the caves and caches in order to preserve them and so I took Some time to appear after the return of captivity
Historical evidence on the legal second books of the BC
First the oldest evidence is their presence in
The Septuagint
In the third century BC (285 BC). The manuscripts are still in existence and contain the first and second legal books
And the picture of her manuscript of the story of Susannah
Manuscripts of Qumran
Some may argue that the Qumran manuscripts contained many writings
In order to answer the second legal books, it was found in the fourth cave with the rest of the first legal books
Like
4Q1962
Tobit - 1 fragment -
4Q243-2452
Daniel - 1 fragment -
Second is the time of Christ
Quotations of Jesus and his disciples from the second legal books
(I will mention this point in detail later in each book)
Thirdly after Christ
The suspicion of parents who objected to the legality of these books
Jerome (347 - 420 m)
Because he said that the Roman synagogue did not accept these books as legal texts and the second purpose of reading them was the structure of the people
And to respond
St. Jerome added these books to his copy, recognizing their legality
His comment is not his personal opinion but rather it is said by the Roman Church which also recognized the legality of these books afterwards
In the period that was not accepted by the Roman synagogue she said it was useful for the builders
Quote a lot for EXamples :
Judith
13 13 13
Wisdom of Solomon
1:11 1:11 2:23 2:24 3:21 4: 9 4: 9 4: 9 4:11 4:11 4:11 4: 11-14 4:13 4:13 4:14 4:14 4:14 5: 4 6: 6 6: 7 7: 1 8: 7 8: 7 9:15 10: 1 10: 1 10: 7
Baruch
5: 5 6
Susanna
1:54 1:55
Bel and the Dragon
1: 33-36 1: 33-39
2 Maccabees
5:17 7
Sirach
1:18 2: 1 2: 1 3:30 3:30 3:30 4:25 7:36 8: 7 8:14 8:17 9: 2-3 10: 1 10: 9 10:30 11:25 13: 1 13: 2 22: 6 22: 6 25: 9 27: 5 27:25 46: 1
After all these evidence says that he did not recognize the legality of this is not true
Rufinos
Who said there is a desire of everyone to read it but there is nothing to give it legal status
Behind him is St. Rufinus
He was born in 340 and left 410 m
He worked for a period of time with St. Jerome in the translation of the Greek Latino but the bear between them and the dispute seemed to St. Refanus in attacking the actions of St. Jerome and despite attempts to settle the dispute did not succeed and the dispute remained between them. And even though Erthuzxi had objections to the Orthodoxy, his objection to the second legal books has no great weight, and he also read that he reads to all
Pope Athanasius
He says these books are not included in the legal books, but they are read to the recruits
He only said that these books were not placed in the first legal books, but they are read to the recruits. He thus affirmed its legality but clarified that it was legal second
And to prove his words to many of his quotations, for example
Tobit
4:18
Judith
9 13: 8 15
Wisdom of Solomon
1: 1 1:11 2:11 2:12 2:12 2:12 2:21 2:23 3:57 6:18 6:24 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:27 Viewing profile 1: 27 9: 2 13: 5 13: 5 14:12 14:12 14:12 14:21 14:21
Baruch
3:12 3:12 3:12
Sirach
1: 9-10 1:25 4:24 4:28 7: 5 7: 5 15: 9 15: 9 15: 9 18:17 30: 4
But if I wanted to talk about parents who have confirmed their legality and quote them, they understand very much
Therefore, he preached to the Fathers before the Synod of His Presence beginning of the disciples of Christ
Father of the first century
St. Ecclementus the Roman departed 96 AD students of St. Peter and St. Paul
St. Ignatius (35 - 98 AD), disciple of St. John
St. Barnabah the departed
St. Papias (70 - 155 AD)
St. Polycarpus (69 - 155 AD), disciple of St. John
Istinus Martyr (100 - 165 m)
St. Erenius (202)
And their quotations
Tobit
4:10 12: 9
Judith
8:19 8:30
Wisdom of Solomon
2:12 2:24
Baruch
4:36 5
Susanna
1:52 1:56
Sirach
4:31 19: 4
The fathers of the second century like
Mark Titan (120 180 m)
St. Theophilus of the Fathers of the Second Century
St. Ethenagoras (133 - 190 AD)
St. Eklemendos of Alexandria (150 - 215 AD)
And their quotations
Tobit
3: 8 3:17 4:15 12: 8
Judith
8:27
Wisdom of Solomon
2:12 2:16 2:22 2:25 3: 1 3: 2-4 3: 5-7 3: 8 3: 9 3:14 4:17 5: 3-5 6: 7 6:10 6: 12-15 6: 17-18 6: 17-20 7:10 7:16 7:17 7: 17-18 7:20 7:21 7:22 7:24 11:24 14: 2-3 16:26
Baruch
3: 9 3:13 3: 16-19 4: 4
2 Maccabees
1:10
Sirach
1: 1 1:18 1: 21-22 1:27 3:29 6:33 7: 23-24 9: 7 9: 8 9: 8 9: 9 9: 9 9:15 9:16 9:18 11 : 4 11:29 14: 1 15:10 16:12 16:12 16:12 18: 13-14 18:30 18:32 19: 2-3 19: 5 19:22 19: 29-30 20: 5 20: 8 20:15 21: 6 21:20 21:21 22: 6-8 23: 4-6 23: 18-19 25: 6 26: 8 26: 9 27:12 30: 8 31: 16-18 31:19 31:20 31:25 31:26 31:27 31:29 31:31 32: 3-4 32: 8 32:11 32:21 33: 6 33:15 34: 14-15 38: 1- 2 38: 8 39: 13-14 39: 26-27 43:11
Mark Tertullian (160 - 220 m)
Tobit
12:12
Wisdom of Solomon
1: 1
Baruch
6: 3
Susanna
1:32
Bel and the Dragon
1: 1852
1 Maccabees
2:41 10:20
2 Maccabees
12: 40-45
Mark Origen (185 - 254 AD)
Tobit
1: 12-14 1:19 1:22 2: 3 12: 7 12: 7
Wisdom of Solomon
1: 4 1: 4 1: 5 1: 7 7:16 7:16 7:25 7: 25-26 7: 25-26 7: 25-26 9: 6 10: 5 11:17 11:20 11: 26 12: 1 12: 1-2 12: 1-2 18:24
Susanna
1:52 1:53 1:56
Bel and the Dragon
1: 31-39
2 Maccabees
7:28
Sirach
6: 4 10: 4 10:19 16:21 18:13 21:18 21:18 39:16 39:17 39:21 43:20
Father of the third century
St. Hepolitus 170 AD to 236 AD
St. Cyprian (258 m)
St. Novatian (200 to 258 m)
Quotations
Tobit
2: 2 2:14 2:14 3:17 4: 5-11 4: 5-11 4:10 4:12 12: 8-9 12: 11-15 12: 12-15 13: 6 14: 11 20: 8
Wisdom of Solomon
1: 1 1:13 2: 1 2:12 2: 12-22 2:13 2:14 2: 15-16 2:16 2:17 2:20 2:24 3: 4 3: 4-8 3: 4-8 3: 4-8 3: 7 3:11 3:11 3:11 4:11 4:11 4:14 5: 1-9 5: 1-9 5: 1-9 5: 8 5:13 6: 6 13: 1-4 13: 1-4 15: 15-17 15: 15-17
Baruch
3: 35-37 3: 35-38 3:36 6: 6
1 Maccabees
2:33 2:52 2:60 2: 62-63 2: 62-63 10
2 Maccabees
6:30 6:30 7: 9 7: 9 7:14 7:14 7:16 7: 16-17 7:18 7: 18-19 7:27 9:12
Sirach
1:14 1:26 2: 1 2: 1 2: 4 2: 4 2: 4-5 2: 5 2: 10-11 3:30 3:30 4:10 4:29 5: 4 5: 7 6 : 16: 7: 7: 7: 7: 7: 7: 9: 9: 9: 9: 10: 9 27: 5 27: 5 27: 5 28:15 28:24 28:24 28:24 28:24 29:12 29:12 34:19 34:25 34:25 48: 3
And also the rest of the fathers of the third century
Gregory Thaumaturgus;
Dinoysius the Great;
Julius Africanus;
Anatolius;
Methodius;
Arnobius
And their quotations
Tobit
12: 7
Wisdom of Solomon
1:13 1:14 2:23 3:16 4: 1-2 4: 2 4: 2 4: 3 4: 6 7: 9 7:22 7:25 11:20 12: 1 15: 3 15:10 -11:24
Baruch
3: 14-15 3: 24-25 3:38
2 Maccabees
3:15
Sirach
1: 2 1: 2 1:10 3:22 6:36 6:36 15: 8 16: 26-27 16: 29-30 18:30 19: 2 20:18 22: 7 23: 1 23: 4 23 : 6 25 38:29 42: 7 48: 1
Lactantius,
Venantius,
Asterius,
Victorinus,
Dionysius,
Tobit
4:15 4:15 4:16 4:16 12: 8-9
Judith
8 8 9: 1 16:21 16:23
Wisdom of Solomon
2: 12-22 2: 12-22 3: 1 3: 1 10: 6 11:20
Baruch
3: 35-37 3: 35-37 3: 35-37 4: 4
Susanna
1:28 1:48
1 Maccabees
1 2: 31-41
Sirach
1:28 2: 4 3:30 4:31 4:31 5: 7 24: 5-7 24:25 25:26 26:29 30:11 30:12 31: 25-31 49:16
And too many other pre-complex parents
The course of quotations during and after the complex is very very realistic
The assemblies
Many assemblies were also held on the passage of the ages to confirm the doctrine of the Church in the legality of these books. Including the Hypo compound in 393 AD. Who attended St. Augustine. The Cartagena complex in 397 CE, the second assembly of Cartagena in 419, the Trent Complex in 1456 for the Catholic Church, the Constantinople compound which was completed in Yash in 1642 and the Jerusalem Synod of the Greek Orthodox Church in 1982.
It is found in many Bible manuscripts from the first centuries such as
Sinaitic, Vatican, Alexandria, Coptic and many others
Ecclesiastical readings from the first centuries such as
: The Coptic Church used since the old chapters of the second legal travel in the Lent and the week of pain
As follows:
Readings of Lent
Packer on Friday of the third week separated from the son of Serach
On the third day of the fourth week, he separated from the son of Serach
Packer Wednesday of the sixth week separated from the son of Serach
Packer on Thursday of the sixth week separated from the son of Serach
Packer on Friday of the sixth week travel the entire Tobia
On the third day of the seventh week, he separated from the son of Serach
Readings of the week of pain
Packers on Monday separated from Son Sirach
The sixth hour of Monday is a chapter of wisdom
The eleventh hour of the day is separated from the son of Sirakh
The third hour on Tuesday is a chapter from the son of Sirakh
The eleventh hour of Wednesday night is a chapter of wisdom
The third hour on Wednesday is a chapter from the son of Serakh
The sixth hour of Wednesday is a chapter from the son of Sirakh
The third hour on Thursday is a chapter from the son of Sirakh
Packer on Friday is a chapter of wisdom
The magic of the Sabbath is the swearing of the three young men and the story of Susanna
The night of the feast is a chapter of wisdom
The Jews
Some Jews recognize the second legal book
Some acknowledge only the first and second Maccabees
The reason was that there were copies of the Sephardic texts in their hands, as well as copies of the Septuagint. But for the Christians, the Septuagint was more widespread with the beginning of Christianity. The Christians found this version and used it in dialogue with the Jews. But used by all the enemies of the Jews in the debate and dialogue with them. They tried to disavow them and cling to the Hebrew version that Ezra had collected. Which made some parents who were arguing with the Jews to care about the Hebrew version only, and to turn a blind eye to the books that came in the Septuagint only, which we call the second legal travel
When Protestants came to translate the Bible and publish it in the world, they preferred to take from the Hebrew original
Therefore, they find that they write on the pages of their translations "translated from the original languages" and mean that they translated the Old Testament from Hebrew and not the Septuagint. Hebrew is the original language. They translated the New Testament from Greek, the New Testament written in Greek. This translation is what is called the Beirut edition. But the Orthodox and Catholic churches throughout the world recognize the Septuagint version as well as the indigenous languages. But the Beirut edition is in our hands so the Orthodox Church printed the second legal books and distributed them separately. Most of the other legal texts were included in the Hebrew version when translated.
And Josephus the Jewish historian
Was not included in the list of legal books of the Torah, which was mentioned by "Josephus" of the Jewish historian in his book. In response to this, Josephus himself, after recounting the books that Ezra had written, wrote: "The books that were put in place after the days of the king returned to the position of the Jews, but they did not have the support of the text to support the legal books. ) Writing against Ebony Header 8.
Small suspicions and quick responses
2 Maccabees 12: 43-46 said that Judah the Maccabee collected an offering of two thousand dirhams of silver, which he sent to Jerusalem to offer a sacrifice for sin. This was a good deed and he met him, believing that the resurrection of the dead was a holy opinion. From sin. " Although legal travel teaches against this.
Reply
Let's get together
And on the morrow, Judah and those with him came to what the Sunnis required, to carry the bodies of the dead and to bury them with their relatives in the graves of their fathers.
And found under the garments of each of the dead, a series of Yemeni idols, which is forbidden by the law against the Jews, and it is clear to everyone that this was the cause of their killing.
Let all the Lord praise the just judge who reveals the hidden things
Then they were fed up and were praying to erase that sin that was erased from all oblivion. And Judah the noble preached to the people that they should depart from sin, seeing with their eyes what they had suffered that fell for sin.
Then he collected from each of them an offering, which amounted to two thousand dirhams of silver, and sent them to Jerusalem to offer a sacrifice for sin, and that was the best thing that he did, and made him believe in the resurrection of the dead.
For if the resurrection of those who were fallen were not resounding, then his prayer for the dead would be vain and vain
And to consider that those who have fallen in piety have saved them a beautiful reward
It is a holy ray that strengthens and for this reason the penance is offered from the dead to be removed from sin
His faith in the resurrection of the dead reflected some of the Sadducees who do not believe in the resurrection of the dead, whom the Lord of glory rebuked when the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob said to them,
Secondly, he first prayed with heat for the forgiveness of sin
3 He offered a sin offering, as it is written in Leviticus 4
Thirdly, the prayer about the dead is something recognized by the Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church for our acknowledgment of the infallibility and the beginning of the law because it stands against us as the complainant, as the Bible says. Justice also requires us to have intercession and counsel. We see Judas offering sacrifices and praying for the dead. The Church raises the offerings of the dead with the same thought. The church prays for the lifting of sins which are not to die or which the believer has forbidden to admit or forget. But whoever sins by being arrogant does not benefit from this prayer. Let us apply this to the state of prayer for the soldiers of Judah here. We will consider their sin to be prayed for, they are believers Mujahideen sacrifice their lives for God and the people of God. But in ignorance they did what they did.
Finally, the answer to those who claimed that the father when the poor recognized the illegality
This is wrong. Let us read together the words of our poor father
In his book "The Thousand Judgment" (I, 1997, p. 3): "The false Hebrew apocrypha, written and compiled by people who were truly involved in knowledge, were not" marketers of the Holy Spirit "(2 Peter 1:21) The second and the second, and the vision of Baruch and Moses and others ». Then he said in the margin of the page itself: «These books are called the fake epochryva, which is the status of the second century before Christ, and the correct teachings and false teachings and some serious distortions mixed together. But they are of historical benefit as documents for the study ».
He did not speak about the second legal books (Tobit Yehudit, the sequel of Daniel, the sequel of Esther, the wisdom of Baruch Joshua, the son of Serach, Maccabees, the first Maccabees, the second, and the Psalm 151), but he spoke of the vision of Ezra and the vision of Enoch and the vision of Baruch (which is different from the Book of Baruch) and the vision of Moses and these are all writings not recognized by the synagogue Neither nor the fathers, he was careful in his words and did not accuse the second legal books, but quoted a lot
The word "apocryphi" means "hidden" and "epicurean" means "hidden travel" and there are two types of epoch
Abocrivia legal and is historically called a second legal as a historical collection arrangement and not less important than the first law only in the time of collection and therefore the second legal toxicity
Abukrivia is illegal and is not inspired by some of the books and others
First Legal Travels
After the return of the captivity collected by Ezra 534 BC
Second Legal Travels
Some did not appear during Ezra, such as Herodit and Tobiah, some of which were written after Ezra, so he was dubbed the second legal history
A question arises here why did not all the books appear during Ezra?
To answer this, we must know that the ancient script was written on the parchment, which is the papers made from the skins of animals and written in bold script, and this one book was weighing a lot. It was difficult for many to carry the books while carrying their young, but the mighty men of God who ventured their lives in order to preserve these books carried some of them and some hid in the caves and caches in order to preserve them and so I took Some time to appear after the return of captivity
Historical evidence on the legal second books of the BC
First the oldest evidence is their presence in
The Septuagint
In the third century BC (285 BC). The manuscripts are still in existence and contain the first and second legal books
And the picture of her manuscript of the story of Susannah
Manuscripts of Qumran
Some may argue that the Qumran manuscripts contained many writings
In order to answer the second legal books, it was found in the fourth cave with the rest of the first legal books
Like
4Q1962
Tobit - 1 fragment -
4Q243-2452
Daniel - 1 fragment -
Second is the time of Christ
Quotations of Jesus and his disciples from the second legal books
(I will mention this point in detail later in each book)
Thirdly after Christ
The suspicion of parents who objected to the legality of these books
Jerome (347 - 420 m)
Because he said that the Roman synagogue did not accept these books as legal texts and the second purpose of reading them was the structure of the people
And to respond
St. Jerome added these books to his copy, recognizing their legality
His comment is not his personal opinion but rather it is said by the Roman Church which also recognized the legality of these books afterwards
In the period that was not accepted by the Roman synagogue she said it was useful for the builders
Quote a lot for EXamples :
Judith
13 13 13
Wisdom of Solomon
1:11 1:11 2:23 2:24 3:21 4: 9 4: 9 4: 9 4:11 4:11 4:11 4: 11-14 4:13 4:13 4:14 4:14 4:14 5: 4 6: 6 6: 7 7: 1 8: 7 8: 7 9:15 10: 1 10: 1 10: 7
Baruch
5: 5 6
Susanna
1:54 1:55
Bel and the Dragon
1: 33-36 1: 33-39
2 Maccabees
5:17 7
Sirach
1:18 2: 1 2: 1 3:30 3:30 3:30 4:25 7:36 8: 7 8:14 8:17 9: 2-3 10: 1 10: 9 10:30 11:25 13: 1 13: 2 22: 6 22: 6 25: 9 27: 5 27:25 46: 1
After all these evidence says that he did not recognize the legality of this is not true
Rufinos
Who said there is a desire of everyone to read it but there is nothing to give it legal status
Behind him is St. Rufinus
He was born in 340 and left 410 m
He worked for a period of time with St. Jerome in the translation of the Greek Latino but the bear between them and the dispute seemed to St. Refanus in attacking the actions of St. Jerome and despite attempts to settle the dispute did not succeed and the dispute remained between them. And even though Erthuzxi had objections to the Orthodoxy, his objection to the second legal books has no great weight, and he also read that he reads to all
Pope Athanasius
He says these books are not included in the legal books, but they are read to the recruits
He only said that these books were not placed in the first legal books, but they are read to the recruits. He thus affirmed its legality but clarified that it was legal second
And to prove his words to many of his quotations, for example
Tobit
4:18
Judith
9 13: 8 15
Wisdom of Solomon
1: 1 1:11 2:11 2:12 2:12 2:12 2:21 2:23 3:57 6:18 6:24 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:25 7:27 Viewing profile 1: 27 9: 2 13: 5 13: 5 14:12 14:12 14:12 14:21 14:21
Baruch
3:12 3:12 3:12
Sirach
1: 9-10 1:25 4:24 4:28 7: 5 7: 5 15: 9 15: 9 15: 9 18:17 30: 4
But if I wanted to talk about parents who have confirmed their legality and quote them, they understand very much
Therefore, he preached to the Fathers before the Synod of His Presence beginning of the disciples of Christ
Father of the first century
St. Ecclementus the Roman departed 96 AD students of St. Peter and St. Paul
St. Ignatius (35 - 98 AD), disciple of St. John
St. Barnabah the departed
St. Papias (70 - 155 AD)
St. Polycarpus (69 - 155 AD), disciple of St. John
Istinus Martyr (100 - 165 m)
St. Erenius (202)
And their quotations
Tobit
4:10 12: 9
Judith
8:19 8:30
Wisdom of Solomon
2:12 2:24
Baruch
4:36 5
Susanna
1:52 1:56
Sirach
4:31 19: 4
The fathers of the second century like
Mark Titan (120 180 m)
St. Theophilus of the Fathers of the Second Century
St. Ethenagoras (133 - 190 AD)
St. Eklemendos of Alexandria (150 - 215 AD)
And their quotations
Tobit
3: 8 3:17 4:15 12: 8
Judith
8:27
Wisdom of Solomon
2:12 2:16 2:22 2:25 3: 1 3: 2-4 3: 5-7 3: 8 3: 9 3:14 4:17 5: 3-5 6: 7 6:10 6: 12-15 6: 17-18 6: 17-20 7:10 7:16 7:17 7: 17-18 7:20 7:21 7:22 7:24 11:24 14: 2-3 16:26
Baruch
3: 9 3:13 3: 16-19 4: 4
2 Maccabees
1:10
Sirach
1: 1 1:18 1: 21-22 1:27 3:29 6:33 7: 23-24 9: 7 9: 8 9: 8 9: 9 9: 9 9:15 9:16 9:18 11 : 4 11:29 14: 1 15:10 16:12 16:12 16:12 18: 13-14 18:30 18:32 19: 2-3 19: 5 19:22 19: 29-30 20: 5 20: 8 20:15 21: 6 21:20 21:21 22: 6-8 23: 4-6 23: 18-19 25: 6 26: 8 26: 9 27:12 30: 8 31: 16-18 31:19 31:20 31:25 31:26 31:27 31:29 31:31 32: 3-4 32: 8 32:11 32:21 33: 6 33:15 34: 14-15 38: 1- 2 38: 8 39: 13-14 39: 26-27 43:11
Mark Tertullian (160 - 220 m)
Tobit
12:12
Wisdom of Solomon
1: 1
Baruch
6: 3
Susanna
1:32
Bel and the Dragon
1: 1852
1 Maccabees
2:41 10:20
2 Maccabees
12: 40-45
Mark Origen (185 - 254 AD)
Tobit
1: 12-14 1:19 1:22 2: 3 12: 7 12: 7
Wisdom of Solomon
1: 4 1: 4 1: 5 1: 7 7:16 7:16 7:25 7: 25-26 7: 25-26 7: 25-26 9: 6 10: 5 11:17 11:20 11: 26 12: 1 12: 1-2 12: 1-2 18:24
Susanna
1:52 1:53 1:56
Bel and the Dragon
1: 31-39
2 Maccabees
7:28
Sirach
6: 4 10: 4 10:19 16:21 18:13 21:18 21:18 39:16 39:17 39:21 43:20
Father of the third century
St. Hepolitus 170 AD to 236 AD
St. Cyprian (258 m)
St. Novatian (200 to 258 m)
Quotations
Tobit
2: 2 2:14 2:14 3:17 4: 5-11 4: 5-11 4:10 4:12 12: 8-9 12: 11-15 12: 12-15 13: 6 14: 11 20: 8
Wisdom of Solomon
1: 1 1:13 2: 1 2:12 2: 12-22 2:13 2:14 2: 15-16 2:16 2:17 2:20 2:24 3: 4 3: 4-8 3: 4-8 3: 4-8 3: 7 3:11 3:11 3:11 4:11 4:11 4:14 5: 1-9 5: 1-9 5: 1-9 5: 8 5:13 6: 6 13: 1-4 13: 1-4 15: 15-17 15: 15-17
Baruch
3: 35-37 3: 35-38 3:36 6: 6
1 Maccabees
2:33 2:52 2:60 2: 62-63 2: 62-63 10
2 Maccabees
6:30 6:30 7: 9 7: 9 7:14 7:14 7:16 7: 16-17 7:18 7: 18-19 7:27 9:12
Sirach
1:14 1:26 2: 1 2: 1 2: 4 2: 4 2: 4-5 2: 5 2: 10-11 3:30 3:30 4:10 4:29 5: 4 5: 7 6 : 16: 7: 7: 7: 7: 7: 7: 9: 9: 9: 9: 10: 9 27: 5 27: 5 27: 5 28:15 28:24 28:24 28:24 28:24 29:12 29:12 34:19 34:25 34:25 48: 3
And also the rest of the fathers of the third century
Gregory Thaumaturgus;
Dinoysius the Great;
Julius Africanus;
Anatolius;
Methodius;
Arnobius
And their quotations
Tobit
12: 7
Wisdom of Solomon
1:13 1:14 2:23 3:16 4: 1-2 4: 2 4: 2 4: 3 4: 6 7: 9 7:22 7:25 11:20 12: 1 15: 3 15:10 -11:24
Baruch
3: 14-15 3: 24-25 3:38
2 Maccabees
3:15
Sirach
1: 2 1: 2 1:10 3:22 6:36 6:36 15: 8 16: 26-27 16: 29-30 18:30 19: 2 20:18 22: 7 23: 1 23: 4 23 : 6 25 38:29 42: 7 48: 1
Lactantius,
Venantius,
Asterius,
Victorinus,
Dionysius,
Tobit
4:15 4:15 4:16 4:16 12: 8-9
Judith
8 8 9: 1 16:21 16:23
Wisdom of Solomon
2: 12-22 2: 12-22 3: 1 3: 1 10: 6 11:20
Baruch
3: 35-37 3: 35-37 3: 35-37 4: 4
Susanna
1:28 1:48
1 Maccabees
1 2: 31-41
Sirach
1:28 2: 4 3:30 4:31 4:31 5: 7 24: 5-7 24:25 25:26 26:29 30:11 30:12 31: 25-31 49:16
And too many other pre-complex parents
The course of quotations during and after the complex is very very realistic
The assemblies
Many assemblies were also held on the passage of the ages to confirm the doctrine of the Church in the legality of these books. Including the Hypo compound in 393 AD. Who attended St. Augustine. The Cartagena complex in 397 CE, the second assembly of Cartagena in 419, the Trent Complex in 1456 for the Catholic Church, the Constantinople compound which was completed in Yash in 1642 and the Jerusalem Synod of the Greek Orthodox Church in 1982.
It is found in many Bible manuscripts from the first centuries such as
Sinaitic, Vatican, Alexandria, Coptic and many others
Ecclesiastical readings from the first centuries such as
: The Coptic Church used since the old chapters of the second legal travel in the Lent and the week of pain
As follows:
Readings of Lent
Packer on Friday of the third week separated from the son of Serach
On the third day of the fourth week, he separated from the son of Serach
Packer Wednesday of the sixth week separated from the son of Serach
Packer on Thursday of the sixth week separated from the son of Serach
Packer on Friday of the sixth week travel the entire Tobia
On the third day of the seventh week, he separated from the son of Serach
Readings of the week of pain
Packers on Monday separated from Son Sirach
The sixth hour of Monday is a chapter of wisdom
The eleventh hour of the day is separated from the son of Sirakh
The third hour on Tuesday is a chapter from the son of Sirakh
The eleventh hour of Wednesday night is a chapter of wisdom
The third hour on Wednesday is a chapter from the son of Serakh
The sixth hour of Wednesday is a chapter from the son of Sirakh
The third hour on Thursday is a chapter from the son of Sirakh
Packer on Friday is a chapter of wisdom
The magic of the Sabbath is the swearing of the three young men and the story of Susanna
The night of the feast is a chapter of wisdom
The Jews
Some Jews recognize the second legal book
Some acknowledge only the first and second Maccabees
The reason was that there were copies of the Sephardic texts in their hands, as well as copies of the Septuagint. But for the Christians, the Septuagint was more widespread with the beginning of Christianity. The Christians found this version and used it in dialogue with the Jews. But used by all the enemies of the Jews in the debate and dialogue with them. They tried to disavow them and cling to the Hebrew version that Ezra had collected. Which made some parents who were arguing with the Jews to care about the Hebrew version only, and to turn a blind eye to the books that came in the Septuagint only, which we call the second legal travel
When Protestants came to translate the Bible and publish it in the world, they preferred to take from the Hebrew original
Therefore, they find that they write on the pages of their translations "translated from the original languages" and mean that they translated the Old Testament from Hebrew and not the Septuagint. Hebrew is the original language. They translated the New Testament from Greek, the New Testament written in Greek. This translation is what is called the Beirut edition. But the Orthodox and Catholic churches throughout the world recognize the Septuagint version as well as the indigenous languages. But the Beirut edition is in our hands so the Orthodox Church printed the second legal books and distributed them separately. Most of the other legal texts were included in the Hebrew version when translated.
And Josephus the Jewish historian
Was not included in the list of legal books of the Torah, which was mentioned by "Josephus" of the Jewish historian in his book. In response to this, Josephus himself, after recounting the books that Ezra had written, wrote: "The books that were put in place after the days of the king returned to the position of the Jews, but they did not have the support of the text to support the legal books. ) Writing against Ebony Header 8.
Small suspicions and quick responses
2 Maccabees 12: 43-46 said that Judah the Maccabee collected an offering of two thousand dirhams of silver, which he sent to Jerusalem to offer a sacrifice for sin. This was a good deed and he met him, believing that the resurrection of the dead was a holy opinion. From sin. " Although legal travel teaches against this.
Reply
Let's get together
And on the morrow, Judah and those with him came to what the Sunnis required, to carry the bodies of the dead and to bury them with their relatives in the graves of their fathers.
And found under the garments of each of the dead, a series of Yemeni idols, which is forbidden by the law against the Jews, and it is clear to everyone that this was the cause of their killing.
Let all the Lord praise the just judge who reveals the hidden things
Then they were fed up and were praying to erase that sin that was erased from all oblivion. And Judah the noble preached to the people that they should depart from sin, seeing with their eyes what they had suffered that fell for sin.
Then he collected from each of them an offering, which amounted to two thousand dirhams of silver, and sent them to Jerusalem to offer a sacrifice for sin, and that was the best thing that he did, and made him believe in the resurrection of the dead.
For if the resurrection of those who were fallen were not resounding, then his prayer for the dead would be vain and vain
And to consider that those who have fallen in piety have saved them a beautiful reward
It is a holy ray that strengthens and for this reason the penance is offered from the dead to be removed from sin
His faith in the resurrection of the dead reflected some of the Sadducees who do not believe in the resurrection of the dead, whom the Lord of glory rebuked when the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob said to them,
Secondly, he first prayed with heat for the forgiveness of sin
3 He offered a sin offering, as it is written in Leviticus 4
Thirdly, the prayer about the dead is something recognized by the Orthodox Church and the Catholic Church for our acknowledgment of the infallibility and the beginning of the law because it stands against us as the complainant, as the Bible says. Justice also requires us to have intercession and counsel. We see Judas offering sacrifices and praying for the dead. The Church raises the offerings of the dead with the same thought. The church prays for the lifting of sins which are not to die or which the believer has forbidden to admit or forget. But whoever sins by being arrogant does not benefit from this prayer. Let us apply this to the state of prayer for the soldiers of Judah here. We will consider their sin to be prayed for, they are believers Mujahideen sacrifice their lives for God and the people of God. But in ignorance they did what they did.
Finally, the answer to those who claimed that the father when the poor recognized the illegality
This is wrong. Let us read together the words of our poor father
In his book "The Thousand Judgment" (I, 1997, p. 3): "The false Hebrew apocrypha, written and compiled by people who were truly involved in knowledge, were not" marketers of the Holy Spirit "(2 Peter 1:21) The second and the second, and the vision of Baruch and Moses and others ». Then he said in the margin of the page itself: «These books are called the fake epochryva, which is the status of the second century before Christ, and the correct teachings and false teachings and some serious distortions mixed together. But they are of historical benefit as documents for the study ».
He did not speak about the second legal books (Tobit Yehudit, the sequel of Daniel, the sequel of Esther, the wisdom of Baruch Joshua, the son of Serach, Maccabees, the first Maccabees, the second, and the Psalm 151), but he spoke of the vision of Ezra and the vision of Enoch and the vision of Baruch (which is different from the Book of Baruch) and the vision of Moses and these are all writings not recognized by the synagogue Neither nor the fathers, he was careful in his words and did not accuse the second legal books, but quoted a lot